In international trade, CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) is a commonly used contract where the seller bears the cost of goods, insurance, and freight until the goods are loaded onto the ship at the port of origin. In India, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is levied on the value of goods and services, including ocean freight. However, in a recent ruling, the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) has held that no GST will be levied on ocean freight under RCM (Reverse Charge Mechanism) in CIF contracts. This blog will explain the ruling and its implications.
CIF stands for "Cost, Insurance and Freight." It is a type of international trade contract used in the sale of goods between a buyer and a seller. Under a CIF contract, the seller is responsible for arranging and paying for the cost of the goods, insurance, and freight charges until the goods are loaded onto the ship at the port of origin. Once the goods are loaded onto the ship, the responsibility for the goods transfers to the buyer, who is responsible for any additional costs, including customs duties, taxes, and other charges, as well as the risk of loss or damage to the goods during transit. The CIF contract is commonly used in the import/export trade and is one of several Incoterms (International Commercial Terms) established by the International Chamber of Commerce to define the responsibilities and obligations of buyers and sellers in international trade.
The Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is a system of taxation where the liability to pay tax is shifted from the supplier of goods or services to the recipient of such goods or services. In other words, the recipient becomes liable to pay tax on behalf of the supplier to the government. This mechanism is usually implemented to simplify the taxation process and to increase compliance by reducing the number of taxpayers who need to register for and pay taxes.
Under the RCM, the recipient of goods or services is required to calculate and pay the tax on behalf of the supplier. The recipient can then claim the tax paid as input tax credit (ITC) against their output tax liability. The supplier is not required to collect and pay the tax to the government.
In India, the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is applicable in certain situations such as for specified goods or services, and for certain types of transactions between registered and unregistered businesses. The objective of RCM is to ensure that tax evasion is minimized and the tax collection process is simplified.
In India, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is levied on the value of goods and services, including ocean freight. However, in a recent ruling by the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), it has been clarified that no GST will be levied on ocean freight under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) in CIF contracts.
Under CIF contracts, the seller bears the cost of goods, insurance, and freight until the goods are loaded onto the ship at the port of origin. The buyer is responsible for paying the customs duties, taxes, and other charges once the goods arrive at the port of destination. In the case of M/s Pitney Bowes India Pvt. Ltd., the applicant had sought clarification on whether they were required to pay GST under RCM on ocean freight charges paid to the shipping company for import of goods under CIF contract.
The AAR held that since the applicant was the importer of the goods and had entered into a CIF contract with the seller, they were not liable to pay GST under RCM on the ocean freight charges paid to the shipping company. The AAR further stated that the supplier of services (shipping company) is located outside India and does not have a GST registration in India. Hence, the supplier is not liable to pay GST on the ocean freight charges.
This ruling has significant implications for importers who enter into CIF contracts, as they can now avoid paying GST under RCM on ocean freight charges paid to the shipping company. However, it is important to note that the ruling applies only to ocean freight charges under CIF contracts. Other charges such as handling charges, terminal charges, and demurrage charges will continue to attract GST under RCM.
In conclusion, the recent ruling by the AAR that no GST will be levied on ocean freight under RCM in CIF contracts is a welcome relief for importers, as it will result in cost savings and simplify the import process. However, it is important for importers to be aware that the ruling applies only to ocean freight charges and not to other charges such as handling charges, terminal charges, and demurrage charges.
The recent ruling by the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) that no GST will be levied on ocean freight under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) in CIF contracts has significant implications for importers who enter into such contracts. Here are some of the key implications of the ruling:
Importers who enter into CIF contracts can now avoid paying GST under RCM on ocean freight charges paid to the shipping company. This will result in cost savings for importers, as they will not be required to pay GST on the ocean freight charges.
The ruling will simplify the import process for importers who enter into CIF contracts, as they will not have to calculate and pay GST under RCM on the ocean freight charges paid to the shipping company. This will also reduce the compliance burden for importers.
Importers who enter into CIF contracts will have a competitive advantage over importers who do not, as they will be able to save on the GST paid on ocean freight charges. This could result in increased demand for CIF contracts.
The ruling provides clarity on the GST liability for importers who enter into CIF contracts. They can now be assured that they are not liable to pay GST under RCM on the ocean freight charges paid to the shipping company.
The ruling will have an impact on shipping companies, as they will not be able to charge GST on the ocean freight charges for importers who enter into CIF contracts. This could result in a reduction in revenue for shipping companies.
In conclusion, the ruling has significant implications for importers who enter into CIF contracts, as it will result in cost savings, simplification of the import process, and a competitive advantage. However, it is important for importers to be aware that the ruling applies only to ocean freight charges and not to other charges such as handling charges, terminal charges, and demurrage charges.
GST Implication on Goods Transport by Road (GTA)
E-Way Bill – GST Authority Vs Judiciary
Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 - Time Limit to Avail ITC
